Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia

Outpatient care for pregnant and puerperal women during the COVID-19 pandemic

DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718473 - volume 42 - Setembro 2020

Surita, Fernanda Garanhani de Castro; Luz, Adriana Gomes; Hsu, Lilian de Paiva Rodrigues; Carvalho, Francisco Herlânio Costa; Brock, Marianna Facchinetti; Nakamura, Mary Uchiyama

Abstract


Full Text

Key-points

 

Recommendations

 

Background

On March 11th, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) decreed a pandemic state for the coronavirus 19, named COVID-19. The rapid evolution of the outbreak, which spread across all continents, generated universal concern, not only for the number of deaths, but also for the worldwide impact in the most diverse spheres.1 In order to prevent further spread of the epidemic, people are advised to stay at home, avoid crowds and promote social distancing, which poses a dilemma for many women during the pregnant puerperal cycle about the possibility of going to hospitals, doctors's offices, laboratories or primary health care units.

Prenatal care is known to be important throughout pregnancy, to identify risk, prevention and management of pregnancy-specific diseases or pre-existing pathological conditions, patient education and health promotion.2

And the same risks and questions apply to outpatient postpartum consultations, a period in a woman's life that even under normal conditions is neglected. Currently, the postpartum period has been the focus of many new studies due to its importance in caring for women, not only in the immediate postpartum period, but also in the long term, considering reproductive planning, mental health, self-care and also in the follow-up guidance for comorbidities.

So far, there are disagreements about what is the risk for pregnant women,in terms of susceptibility or adverse results in SARS-CoV-2 infection (severe acute respiratory syndrome by coronavirus) compared to the general population. Some respiratory diseases, such as H1N1, have been associated with worse results in pregnant women, but initial studies on COVID-19 infection among pregnant women have not shown this increased risk.34 However, we need to cite national data with a significant increase in maternal mortality from infection with the new coronavirus.5

More recent data show a greater concern among affected pregnant women. Serious manifestations of the disease, admission to the ICU and mechanical ventilation were more frequent among pregnant women, although there is no description of increased mortality rates so far.6 Adverse perinatal results such as increased rates of prematurity and fetal death have also been reported.7 However, the mortality data should be revised and adjusted by age, and may bring new results in the future.

Pregnant women with chronic diseases (hypertension, diabetes) or obesity should be considered at higher risk for complications of COVID-19 infection as well as the general population.5

However, it is known that prenatal and postnatal follow-up should not be suspended, given the importance of monitoring and following-up in decreasing maternal-fetal, neonatal and puerperal risks.

 

How to structure the changes in outpatient care for pregnant and puerperal women while there is a risk of infection for COVID-19?

The risk of going to health units, doctor's offices or just leaving home should be considered at each scheduled prenatal visit. Alternative approaches in providing antenatal care have been proposed as a strategy in the effort to control the spread of COVID-19 among patients, caregivers and staff. Even if evidence is limited in relation to the safety and effectiveness of these approaches, several international entities recognize the need to implement innovative strategies during this rapidly evolving public health emergency, considering the differences in the care environments and the population's risks.

Thus, consultations should be used in the best possible way with the greatest amount of clarification and guidance that can be carried out. We must consider grouping the components of the treatment (for example, vaccines, blood glucose tests, ultrasound examinations, etc.) However, for some situations of high-risk pregnant women and in the third trimester, there is no way to guide waiving or spacing of prenatal visits. Frequent situations such as those of pregnant women with any form of hypertension, diabetes, fetal growth restriction cannot be left without qualified outpatient follow-up as it could increase the risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. In addition to these, other conditions also cannot go without close monitoring, as social vulnerability and serious illnesses (heart disease, autoimmune diseases, neoplasms).

The burden of this unprecedented situation we are experiencing can be somehow minimized with the organization of health services that assist pregnant and postpartum women.

Since the beginning of the pandemic, numerous service protocols have been created and updated at a unique speed that makes it difficult to stay updated on the topic. However, some precautions are consensus both in the structuring of services and in individual care. It is recommended to review the existing flows for early identification and immediate care in a specific location for “COVID care” for symptomatic pregnant and postpartum women, optimizing care. And, in a general way for all pregnant and postpartum women to reduce their stay in Health Units.8

 

What changes in the structuring of services should be implemented?

Thus, it is essential to reorganize the health service to provide adequate care for pregnant and puerperal women.

 

What changes in individual care should be made?

 

How to manage some medications used frequently in pregnancy?

Below are some guidelines on the use of some medications that may be needed during prenatal care and what changes if you suspect or confirm a COVID-19 infection:

 

Asymptomatic obstetric patients and universal testing - What do we know?

In the first study in the USA testing COVID-19 in 100% of pregnant women (n = 215), 1.9% were symptomatic and tested positive for COVID-19, among asymptomatic 84.6% tested negative and 13.5 % tested positive for COVID-19. This study was in parturient women, but probably the proportion among pregnant women in prenatal care is similar.13 Also in the USA, another study drew attention to the low prevalence of COVID-19 (2.7% [5/188]) in universal testing among pregnant women and puerperal women, and among asymptomatic, only 2 positive cases, which were negative in the 2nd sample.14 However, in a study in Japan, the percentage of positive tests among asymptomatic obstetric patients was 4%.15

So far, we do not have universal testing data in Brazil, but national studies are being carried out for this purpose. While we do not have all data, everyone, health professionals and pregnant/puerperal women must protect themselves and prevent the spread of the virus.16

 

How to innovate in antenatal education and mental health care?

Social distancing makes it impossible to carry out groups pregnant women. Antenatal education groups have been increasingly valued, due to the possibility of different orientations by a multidisciplinary team, not only about the evolution of pregnancy and childbirth. These groups deal with issues that are important for women and that are usually superficially addressed in individual medical appointments, due to lack of time or other difficulties. Rights of pregnant women, possibilities of contraception in the immediate postpartum or postpartum consultation, nutritional aspects, domestic violence, depression and anxiety, physical activity, breastfeeding and care for newborns are topics that need to be discussed during prenatal care , so that women feel more empowered and have a positive experience in their pregnancy and postpartum period.(2)

It is necessary to think of new ways to reinvent the activities carried out in groups for pregnant women, through the use of educational videos, mobile phone applications, online groups, in short, all types of educational / informational material that could be offered without risk of contamination. In addition to making the most of individual consultation time for these approaches.

Another differential of this pandemic period is the increase in anxiety, sadness and fear. The uncertain scenario related to the disease, pregnant and puerperal women infected or not with COVID-19 may be experiencing intense psychological suffering, which can cause serious consequences in terms of mental health.(17) It would be interesting for pregnant and puerperal women to have a way of communicate with health professionals in case of psychological distress or to resolve doubts during this period.

Studies have shown poor sleep quality in pregnant women and it is observed that sleep disorders seem to worsen throughout pregnancy, which may have impacts on labor, maternal and fetal health. Poor sleep quality can be even greater in these pandemic periods with social distancing, reduced leisure activities and anxiety.(1819)

All these details in outpatient care must include women in pregnancy in the postpartum period. We cannot neglect women in the postpartum period, as it is known that most maternal deaths occur in the puerperium and are related to delay or difficulty in accessing health services after the woman's hospital discharge.

 

Final considerations

The priority today is to reduce the public health burden of COVID-19. We obstetricians and gynecologists have an obligation to help implement simple measures to make pregnant women and postpartum women aware of safe practices such as hand hygiene, wearing masks, social distancing, cough etiquette, staying at home whenever possible and disinfecting surfaces often. For as long as there is no vaccine, these precautions are what can reduce contamination and save lives. We cannot refrain from offering qualified care focused on the needs of each woman, and try to provide, even in times of exception like this pandemic, a positive and safe experience during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium as recommended by the WHO good practices.

National Specialized Commission on Prenatal Care of the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations (FEBRASGO)

President:

Fernanda Garanhani de Castro Surita

Vice-President:

Lilian de Paiva Rodrigues Hsu

Secretary:

Adriana Gomes Luz

Members:

Edson Gomes Tristão

Eliana Martorano Amaral

Eugenia Glaucy Moura Ferreira

Francisco Herlanio Costa Carvalho

Joeline Maria Cleto Cerqueira

José Meirelles Filho

Luciana Silva dos Anjos França

Marianna Facchinetti Brock

Mary Uchiyama Nakamura

Patricia Gonçalves Teixeira

Renato Ajeje

Sérgio Hecker Luz


Keywords


References

  1. Rolling updates on coronavirus disease (COVID-19): WHO characterizes COVID-19 as a pandemic. https://www.who. int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/events-asthey- happen

    » https://www.who. int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/events-asthey- happen

  2. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience, 2016. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/ha ndle/10665/250796/9789241549912-eng.pdf;jsessionid= E15FAE016E07E0B15DB6D0D5223BB51D?sequence=1

    » https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/ha ndle/10665/250796/9789241549912-eng.pdf;jsessionid= E15FAE016E07E0B15DB6D0D5223BB51D?sequence=1

  3. Rasmussen SA, et al. Effects of influenza on pregnant women and infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012. Sep;207(3 Suppl):S3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.068.

    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.068.

  4. Mosby LG, Ellington SR, Forhan SE, Yeung LF, Perez M, Shah MM, MacFarlane K, Laird SK, House LD, Jamieson DJ.The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's maternal health response to 2009 H1N1 influenza. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;204(6 Suppl 1):S7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.057

    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.057

  5. Takemoto MLS, Menezes MO, Andreucci CB, Nakamura-Pereira M, Amorim MMR, Katz L, Knobel R. The tragedy of COVID-19 in Brazil: 124 maternal deaths and counting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jul 9. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13300

    » https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13300

  6. ACOG - Novel Coronavirus 2019 (COVID 19) . Practice Advisory. July 2020 https://www.acog.org/en/Clinical/Clinical%20 Guidance/Practice%20Advisory/Articles/2020/03/Novel%20 Coronavirus%202019 Access 07.06.2020

    » https://www.acog.org/en/Clinical/Clinical%20 Guidance/Practice%20Advisory/Articles/2020/03/Novel%20 Coronavirus%202019

  7. Lambelet V, Vouga M, Pomar L, Favre G, Gerbier E, Panchaud A, Baud D. Sars-CoV-2 in the context of past coronaviruses epidemics: Consideration for prenatal care. Prenat Diagn. 2020 May 26:10.1002/pd.5759. doi: 10.1002/pd.5759. Online ahead of print

    » https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5759

  8. Safe motherhood and COVID-19 https://www.figo.org/safemotherhood- and-covid-19

    » https://www.figo.org/safemotherhood- and-covid-19

  9. ORIENTAÇÕES GERAIS - Máscaras faciais de uso não profissional - NT Anvisa http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/ documents/219201/4340788/NT+M%C3%A1scaras.pdf/ bf430184-8550-42cb-a975-1d5e1c5a10f

    » http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/ documents/219201/4340788/NT+M%C3%A1scaras.pdf/ bf430184-8550-42cb-a975-1d5e1c5a10f

  10. Bourne T, Leonardi M, Kyriacou C, Al-Memar M, Landolfo C, Cibula D, Condous G, Metzger U, Fischerova D, Timmerman D, van den Bosch. ISUOG Consensus Statement on rationalization of gynecological ultrasound services in context of SARS-CoV-2. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;55(6):879-885. doi: 10.1002/uog.22047

    » https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22047

  11. COVID-19 FAQs for Obstetrician-Gynecologists, Obstetrics https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/physician-faqs/ covid-19-faqs-for-ob-gyns-obstetrics

    » https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/physician-faqs/ covid-19-faqs-for-ob-gyns-obstetrics

  12. European Medicines Agency. EMA gives advice on the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatories for COVID-19 https://www. ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-gives-advice-use-non-steroidalanti- inflammatories-covid-19

    » https://www. ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-gives-advice-use-non-steroidalanti- inflammatories-covid-19

  13. Sutton D1, Fuchs K1, D'Alton M1, Goffman D1. Universal Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in Women Admitted for Delivery. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2009316. [Epub ahead of print]

    » https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2009316

  14. LaCourse SM, Kachikis A, Blain M, Simmons LE, Mays JA, Pattison AD, Salerno CC, McCartney SA, Kretzer NM, Resnick R, Shay RL, Savitsky LM, Curtin AC, Huebner EM, Ma KK, Delaney S, Delgado C, Schippers A, Munson J, Pottinger PS, Cohen S, Neme S, Bourassa L, Bryan A, Greninger A, Jerome KR, Roxby AC, Lokken E, Cheng E, Adams Waldorf KM, Hitti J. Low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among pregnant and postpartum patients with universal screening in Seattle, Washington. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 May 30:ciaa675. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa675. Online ahead of print.

    » https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa675

  15. Ochiai D, Kasuga Y, Iida M, Ikenoue S, Tanaka M.Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic obstetric patients in Tokyo, Japan.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jun 4. doi: 10.1002/ ijgo.13252.

    » https://doi.org/10.1002/ ijgo.13252

  16. Costa ML, Pacagnella RC, Guida JP, Souza RT, Charles CM, Lajos GJ, Haddad SM, Fernandes KG, Nobrega GM, Griggio TB, Pabon SL, Serruya SJ, Ribeiro-do-Valle CC, Cecatti JG; Brazilian Network for Studies on Reproductive and Perinatal Research. Call to action for a South American network to fight COVID-19 in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 May 15. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13225.

    » https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13225

  17. Freitas-Jesus JV, Rodrigues L, Surita FG. The Experience of Women Infected by the COVID-19 during Pregnancy in Brazil: A Qualitative Study Protocol. Repr. Health 17, 108 (2020).

  18. Hutchison BL, Stone PR, McCowan LME, Stewart AW, Thompson JMD, Mitchell EA. A postal survey of maternal sleep in late pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12.

  19. Facco FL. Sleep-disordered breathing and pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2011 Dec;35(6):335-9.